🤖 The Contenders:
- GPT-4 🧠
- Claude 3.5 ⚖️
- LLaMA 3.1 (405B & 8B) 🦙
⚔️ The Battleground:
We tested coding, logic, real-time data, document analysis & even morality!
🏆 And the Winner Is…
It’s a tight race! LLaMA 3.1 (405B) surprised us, going toe-to-toe with the giants and even surpassing them in some tasks. 🤯
Key Takeaways:
- Coding Prowess: All models aced basic Python, but GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 excelled with Pygame. 🐍
- Logic & Reasoning: LLaMA 3.1 (405B) stunned us, solving a tricky marble puzzle that stumped GPT-4 and Claude. 🤔
- Real-Time Knowledge: GPT-4 and Claude 3.5, equipped with web access, provided accurate Olympic medal standings. 🥇
- Document Analysis: All models breezed through Tesla’s financial report, extracting key data points with ease. 📈
- Moral Dilemmas: Responses varied wildly, highlighting the complexities of AI ethics.
🚀 The Future of LLMs:
Open-source models like LLaMA 3.1 are rapidly closing the gap. With web access and memory on the horizon, the possibilities are limitless!
🧰 Your AI Toolkit:
- ChatHub: Compare multiple LLMs side-by-side. https://chathub.gg/?utm_source=berman – A playground for AI enthusiasts!
Want to dive deeper into the AI revolution? 🤔
Subscribe to Matthew Berman’s channel for the latest insights! 👇🏼
https://www.youtube.com/@matthew_berman
